FrontPage › HelpOnSubPages › PoliticalWebProject/References
PoliticalWebProject/References
[edit]

Reading lists ΒΆ


  1. Bar-Ilan, J. (2002). How much information do search engines disclose on the links to a web page? A longitudinal case study of the 'cybermetrics' home page. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 455-466.
  2. Borgida, E., & Stark, E. N. (2004). New Media and Politics: Some Insights From Social and Political Psychology. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 467-478.
  3. Calise, M., & Lowi, T. J. (2000). Hyperpolitics: Hypertext, Concepts and Theory-Making. International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, 21(3), 283-310.
  4. Carlson, T., & Djupsund, G. (2001). Old Wine in New Bottles?: The 1999 Finnish Election Campaign on the Internet. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(1), 68-87.
  5. Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing E-Democracy Back In: Why it Matters for Future Research on E-Governance. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 443-455.
  6. Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2004). The contribution of data mining to information science. Journal of Information Science, 30(6), 550-558.
  7. Chiu, C.-M. (2001). Towards multiple hypermedia in information services. Journal of Information Science, 27(6), 403-416.
  8. Currah, A. (2003). The Virtual Geographies of Retail Display. Journal of Consumer Culture, 3(1), 5-37.
  9. Dacin, M. T., Ventresca, M. J., & Beal, B. D. (1999). The Embeddedness of Organizations: Dialogue & Directions. Journal of Management, 25(3), 317-356.
  10. Eveland, W. P., & Dunwoody, S. (1998). Users and navigation patterns of a science World Wide Web site for the public. Public Understanding of Science, 7(4), 285-311.
  11. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Marton, K., & Seo, M. (2004). Moving beyond "Just the Facts": The Influence of Online News on the Content and Structure of Public Affairs Knowledge. Communication Research, 31(1), 82-108.
  12. Eveland, W. P. J., & Dunwoody, S. (2001). User Control and Structural Isomorphism or Disorientation and Cognitive Load?: Learning From the Web Versus Print. Communication Research, 28(1), 48-78.
  13. Ferrigno-Stack, J., Robinson, J. P., Kestnbaum, M., Neustadtl, A., & Alvarez, A. (2003). Internet and Society: A Summary of Research Reported at Webshop 2001. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 73-117.
  14. George, C. (2005). The internet's political impact and the penetration/participation paradox in Malaysia and Singapore. Media Culture Society, 27(6), 903-920.
  15. Gibson, R. K., Margolis, M., Resnick, D., & Ward, S. J. (2003). Election Campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK: A Comparative Analysis. Party Politics, 9(1), 47-75.
  16. Goh, D. H., & Ang, R. P. (2002). Are pay for performance search engines relevant? Journal of Information Science, 28(5), 349-355.
  17. Gretzel, U., Yuan, Y.-L., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2000). Preparing for the New Economy: Advertising Strategies and Change in Destination Marketing Organizations. Journal of Travel Research, 39(2), 146-156.
  18. Hara, N., & Estrada, Z. (2005). Analyzing the mobilization of grassroots activities via the internet: a case study. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 503-514.
  19. Holliday, I., & Kwok, R. C. W. (2004). Governance in the Information Age: Building E-Government in Hong Kong. New Media Society, 6(4), 549-570.
  20. Howard, P. N. (2002). Network Ethnography and the Hypermedia Organization: New Media, New Organizations, New Methods. New Media Society, 4(4), 550-574.
  21. James, J. (2001). A Web-based registry of low-cost information technologies for developing countries. Journal of Information Science, 27(4), 219-225.
  22. Kaid, L. L. (2003). Effects of Political Information in the 2000 Presidential Campaign: Comparing Traditional Television and Internet Exposure. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(5), 677-691.
  23. Kim, E.-G., & Hamilton, J. W. (2006). Capitulation to capital? OhmyNews as alternative media. Media Culture Society, 28(4), 541-560.
  24. Kim, H., Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2006). Comparing Academic Hyperlink Structures with Journal Publishing in Korea: A Social Network Analysis. Science Communication, 27(4), 540-564.
  25. Kim, S. T., & Weaver, D. (2002). Communication Research About the Internet: a Thematic Meta-analysis. New Media Society, 4(4), 518-538.
  26. Krasnoboka, N. (2002). 'Real Journalism Goes Underground: The Internet Underground': The Phenomenon of Online Media in the Former Soviet Union Republics. Gazette, 64(5), 479-499.
  27. Krueger, B. S. (2002). Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States: A Resource Approach. American Politics Research, 30(5), 476-498.
  28. Krueger, B. S. (2005). Government Surveillance and Political Participation on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 23(4), 439-452.
  29. la Porte, T. M., Demchak, C. C., & de Jong, M. (2002). Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the Web: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Speculations. Administration Society, 34(4), 411-446.
  30. Lawson-Borders, G., & Kirk, R. (2005). Blogs in Campaign Communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(4), 548-559.
  31. Leizerov, S. (2000). Privacy Advocacy Groups Versus Intel: A Case Study of How Social Movements Are Tactically Using the Internet to Fight Corporations. Social Science Computer Review, 18(4), 461-483.
  32. Lewandowski, D., Wahlig, H., & Meyer-Bautor, G. (2006). The freshness of web search engine databases. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 131-148.
  33. Lusoli, W., & Ward, J. (2005). "Politics Makes Strange Bedfellows": The Internet and the 2004 European Parliament Election in Britain. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(4), 71-97.
  34. MacDougall, R. (2005). Identity, Electronic Ethos, and Blogs: A Technologic Analysis of Symbolic Exchange on the New News Medium. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(4), 575-599.
  35. Mason, B., & Dicks, B. (2001). Going Beyond the Code: The Production of Hypermedia Ethnography. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 445-457.
  36. Muir, A., & Oppenheim, C. (2002). National Information Policy developments worldwide III: e-commerce. Journal of Information Science, 28(5), 357-373.
  37. Myles, J. (2004). Community Networks and Cultural Intermediaries: The Politics of Community Net Development in Greater Manchester. Media Culture Society, 26(4), 467-490.
  38. Netchaeva, I. (2002). E-Government and E-Democracy: A Comparison of Opportunities in the North and South. Gazette, 64(5), 467-477.
  39. Nip, J. Y. M. (2004). The Relationship between Online and Offline Communities: The Case of the Queer Sisters. Media Culture Society, 26(3), 409-428.
  40. Nord, L. W. (2006). Still the Middle Way: A Study of Political Communication Practices in Swedish Election Campaigns. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(1), 64-76.
  41. Norris, P. (2003). Preaching to the Converted?: Pluralism, Participation and Party Websites. Party Politics, 9(1), 21-45.
  42. Novotny, P. (2002). Local Television, the World Wide Web, and the 2000 Presidential Election. Social Science Computer Review, 20(1), 58-72.
  43. Ogden, D., & Rose, R. A. (2005). Using Giddens's Structuration Theory to Examine the Waning Participation of African Americans in Baseball. Journal of Black Studies, 35(4), 225-245.
  44. Orford, S., Harris, R., & Dorling, D. (1999). Geography: Information Visualization in the Social Sciences-A State-of-the-Art Review. Social Science Computer Review, 17(3), 289-304.
  45. Papson, S., Goldman, R., & Kersey, N. (2004). Web Site Design: Hypertext Aesthetics and Visual Sociology. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12), 1617-1643.
  46. Pfau, M., Houston, J. B., & Semmler, S. M. (2005). Presidential Election Campaigns and American Democracy: The Relationship Between Communication Use and Normative Outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(1), 48-62.
  47. Polat, R. K. (2005). The Internet and Political Participation: Exploring the Explanatory Links. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 435-459.
  48. Rogers, R., & Marres, N. (2000). Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), 141-163.
  49. Sawhney, H., & Lee, S. (2005). Arenas of innovation: understanding new configurational potentialities of communication technologies. Media Culture Society, 27(3), 391-414.
  50. Schoen, H., & Faas, T. (2005). When Methodology Interferes With Substance: The Difference of Attitudes Toward E-Campaigning and E-Voting in Online and Offline Surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 326-333.
  51. Schweitzer, E. J. (2005). Election Campaigning Online: German Party Websites in the 2002 National Elections. European Journal of Communication, 20(3), 327-351.
  52. Scott, B. (2005). A Contemporary History of Digital Journalism. Television New Media, 6(1), 89-126.
  53. Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P. J. R., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and Expression in a Digital Age: Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531-565.
  54. Stanley, J. W., & Weare, C. (2004). The Effects of Internet Use on Political Participation: Evidence From an Agency Online Discussion Forum. Administration Society, 36(5), 503-527.
  55. Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. (2003). Explicating Web Site Interactivity: Impression Formation Effects in Political Campaign Sites. Communication Research, 30(1), 30-59.
  56. Thelwall, M. (2001). Exploring the link structure of the Web with network diagrams. Journal of Information Science, 27(6), 393-401.
  57. Thelwall, M. (2002). The top 100 linked-to pages on UK university web sites: high inlink counts are not usually associated with quality scholarly content. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 483-491.
  58. Thelwall, M. (2003). Web use and peer interconnectivity metrics for academic web sites. Journal of Information Science, 29(1), 1-10.
  59. Thelwall, M., Harries, G., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Why Do Web Sites from Different Academic Subjects Interlink? Journal of Information Science, 29(6), 453-471.
  60. Thomas, P. (2006). The Communication Rights in the Information Society (CRIS) Campaign: Applying Social Movement Theories to an Analysis of Global Media Reform. International Communication Gazette, 68(4), 291-312.
  61. Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do People Watch what they Do Not Trust?: Exploring the Association between News Media Skepticism and Exposure. Communication Research, 30(5), 504-529.
  62. Wilkinson, D., Harries, G., Thelwall, M., & Price, L. (2003). Motivations for academic web site interlinking: evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 29(1), 49-56.
  63. Wilkinson, D., Thelwall, M., & Li, X. (2003). Exploiting Hyperlinks to Study Academic Web Use. Social Science Computer Review, 21(3), 340-351.
  64. Williams, A. P., & Trammell, K. D. (2005). Candidate Campaign E-Mail Messages in the Presidential Election 2004. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(4), 560-574.
  65. Yaros, R. A. (2006). Is It the Medium or the Message? Structuring Complex News to Enhance Engagement and Situational Understanding by Nonexperts. Communication Research, 33(4), 285-309.

Username:

55. Sundar, Kalyanaraman, and Brown study the effects of interactivity in political campaign sites. They argue that interactivity has been articulated in two kinds. First is functional approach, which considers interactivity as presence or absence of interactive features (devices) in web pages. The latter, contingency approach, which has been elaborated by Rafaeli for years, is the level of contingent reference to what has been communicated between communication parties. -- hkimscil 2006-09-12 14:12:21
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! powered by MoniWiki
last modified 2012-05-08 14:46:25
Processing time 0.0087 sec