Dear sir,


RE: Notification of US$1,200,000.00 payment



This is to officially notify you that you have been selected by the board of trustees of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) as one of the winners of US$1,200,000.00 prize money in the international global literacy lottery programme held on Wednesday 12th August 2009.


Participants of this international lottery programme were selected randomly through computer balloting system drawn from over 350,000 company and private sector individuals emails from Australia, New Zealand, Africa, Europe, North America, South America and Asia as part of the 2009 global literacy and communications support program held in the United Kingdom.

For the immediate collection of your US$1,200,000.00 prize money with reference number UNESCO/IGL-09027, kindly contact today directly by email or telephone our Payment Coordinator in the United Kingdom:


Mrs. Allen Verena Sagrario
3 Whitehall Court, London SW1A 2EL,United Kingdom
Telephone: +44-844-774-2984
E-mail: avsagrario@terrapins.com



Due to the mix up of some names and entries, we ask that you keep this award strictly private from public notice until you have claimed your US$1,200,000.00 to avoid transfer complications.

Your US$1,200,000.00 prize money must be claimed before 30th September 2009, after this date all unclaimed Winnings will be rolled over and returned back to the treasury.

All correspondences to Payment Coordinator should have this email sent along with it along with your Contact Address, Country of residence and your Email address.
Furthermore, should there be any change of your Contact Address, do inform the Payment Coordinator as soon as possible.

Once again congratulations.

Yours faithfully,

Harris Steiner, Vice-President Awards
UNESCO,1, Rue Mollies 75732 Paris Cedex 15 France.

alt.pub.coffeehouse.amethyst
	
Message from discussion Green Card Lottery- Final One?

View parsed - Show only message text

Path: gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!hookup!news2.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!indirect.com!nike
From: n...@indirect.com (Laurence Canter)
Newsgroups: alt.brother-jed,alt.pub.coffeehouse.amethyst
Subject: Green Card Lottery- Final One?
Date: 12 Apr 1994 07:40:42 GMT
Organization: Canter & Siegel
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <2odj9q$25q@herald.indirect.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: id1.indirect.com

Green Card Lottery 1994 May Be The Last One!
THE DEADLINE HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED.

The Green Card Lottery is a completely legal program giving away a 
certain annual allotment of Green Cards to persons born in certain 
countries. The lottery program was scheduled to continue on a 
permanent basis.  However, recently, Senator Alan J Simpson 
introduced a bill into the U. S. Congress which could end any future 
lotteries. THE 1994 LOTTERY IS SCHEDULED TO TAKE PLACE 
SOON, BUT IT MAY BE THE VERY LAST ONE.

PERSONS BORN IN MOST COUNTRIES QUALIFY, MANY FOR 
FIRST TIME.

The only countries NOT qualifying  are: Mexico; India; P.R. China; 
Taiwan, Philippines, North Korea, Canada, United Kingdom (except 
Northern Ireland), Jamaica, Domican Republic, El Salvador and 
Vietnam. 

Lottery registration will take place soon.  55,000 Green Cards will be 
given to those who register correctly.  NO JOB IS REQUIRED.

THERE IS A STRICT JUNE DEADLINE. THE TIME TO START IS 
NOW!!

For FREE information via Email, send request to
cs...@indirect.com


-- 
*****************************************************************
Canter & Siegel, Immigration Attorneys
3333 E Camelback Road, Ste 250, Phoenix AZ  85018  USA
cs...@indirect.com   telephone (602)661-3911  Fax (602) 451-7617

misc.legal

		
Message from discussion Green Card Lottery - Last Call - <AD>

View parsed - Show only message text

Newsgroups: misc.legal,alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk
Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.intercon.com!udel!news2.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!nwnexus!jhgrud!eskimo!delisle
From: deli...@eskimo.com (Ben Delisle)
Subject: Re: Green Card Lottery - Last Call - <AD>
Message-ID: <CrBBFv.5z0@eskimo.com>
Organization: Core Dump Cafe 
References: <1994Jun12.042622.18915@nntpxfer.psi.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 1994 01:42:59 GMT
Lines: 418

 Ref: cs...@pericles.com
  
	I found an interesting article about the CSLAW
group and their green card lottery business. I geuss that
it may be interesting to forward this since they are advertising
in many newsgroups again.

	Begin: bio cslaw
  
 From: DRHil...@kaiwan.com (Dennis R. Hilton)
 Subject: Re: Green Card Lottery - Last Call - <AD>
 References: <1994Jun12.000310.14...@nntpxfer.psi.com>

Attorney negligence?? Did they file their taxes??
Nevada Secretary of State, Corporate Record
Name: Sheridan Worldwide, Incorporated
Type: Regular (Domestic Profit)
Corporate Status: REVOKED 11/01/93
Duration: Perpetual
Date of Incorporation: 02/18/92
State: Nevada
Registered Agent: Corporation Service Company
Registered Office: 530 South Fourth Street
                   Las Vegas NV 89101
Purpose: All legal activities
Capital/Stock:
        Capital:        $5,000
        Par Shares:      5,000
        Par Value:       1,000

Annual-Report:
        Last:   60 Day List of Officers
        Last filed: 04/14/92
        Ending Year: 1993

President: Laurence A. Canter
           7739 E. Broadway Suite 410
           Tuscon, AZ  85710

Status: Added 04/14/92

Secretary: Martha S. Siegel
           7739 E. Broadway Suite 410
           Tuscon AZ  85710

Treasurer: Laurence A. Canter
           7739 E. Broadway Suite 410
           Tuscon AZ  85710

Directors: Corporation Information Service
           1201 Hays Street
           Tallahassee, FL  32301

Corporation Number: 1440-92

Laurence A. Canter
PO Box 13510
Scottsdale, Arizona

Concentration: Immigration & Nationality Law (100%)

Admitted: 1978 admitted TN; Not admitted Arizona

Law-School: St. Mary's University of San Antonio (J.D.)

College: University of Arizona (B.A.)

Born: 1953

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


Martha S. Siegel
30 Brookfield Dr.
Iowa City, Iowa

Admitted: 1980 admitted TN; Not admitted Iowa

Law-School: St. Mary's University of San Antonio (J.D.)

College: Carnegie Mellon University (B.A.)

Born: 1948

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   TRW REDI Property Data, Copyright (c) 1993

                    PROPERTY RECORDS FOR MARICOPA COUNTY, AZ

            ESTIMATED TAX ROLL CERTIFICATION DATE NOVEMBER 15, 1992

Owner: CAVOLO ANTHONY M

Mailing Address: 11480 N 103RD PL SCOTTSDALE AZ 85260

***************************** LOCATION ***********************************

Property Address: 11480 00103RD PL N 85260

Municipality: SCOTTSDALE AZ

Property Use (REDI): Single Family Residence

Assessor's Parcel Number: 217-26-186

***************************** ASSESSMENT VALUES **************************

Land Value:     $   60,000

Improvements:      208,671

Total Value:    $  268,671

Property Tax: $ 2,433.48

Use Code: RESID SGL FAMILY

***************************** SALE INFORMATION ***************************

Buyer:  CANTER LAURENCE  A & MARTHA S

Sale Price: $ 298,000

Transfer Date: 01/93

Document Number: 930038000

Improved Square Feet: 3,383 (building)

Year Constructed: 1981

************************* PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS ***********************
Units:                        Stories:  1.0
Rooms:      8                 Heating:  FORCED AIR
Bedrooms:                     Cooling:  REFRIGERATION
Bathrooms:                    Floor:
Fireplaces:                   Walls:    STUCCO BLOCK
Pool:       YES               Const:





                  MARICOPA COUNTY, AZ 11480 00103RD PL N
85260

**************************************************************************
                        #   #   #

                                        For Immediate Release
                                        October 13,1988
                                        Contact:        Bonnie L Mahon
                                                        The Florida Bar
                                                        Tampa Office
                                        Telephone:      813/875-9821

        SUPREME COURT GRANTS ATTORNEY'S PETITION TO RESIGN PERMANENTLY

        TALLAHASSEE, Oct.13-- The Florida Supreme Court has granted attorney
Laurence A. Canter's petition to resign permanently, effective November 7,
1988.

        Canter, of 240 North Washington Boulevard, Sarasota, was charged
with numerous violations of the attorney disciplinary rules including
neglect, misrepresentation, misappropriation of client funds and perjury.

        Several of the complaints against Canter involved his failure to
file the necessary or appropriate documents with the United Stated
Immigration and Naturalization Services in matters of permanent residency
and work visas. In addition, Canter refused to refund clients' funds and
neglected to notify his clients that he has been suspended from the practice
of law as a result of a previous discipline.

        The Florida Bar further alleges that Canter committed perjury by
filing a false affidavit with the Bar and while testifying under oath in a
deposition. These charges resulted after an audit of Canter's trust account
by the Bar showed that trust funds were held in Canter's account during the
time period when he denied any funds were present.

        Canter was born in 1953 and admitted to The Florida Bar in 1980.

        The resignation without leave to apply is not final until time
expires to file motion for rehearing and if filed, determined. The filling
of a motion for rehearing shall not alter the effective date of this
resignation.

        As an official agency of the Supreme Court of Florida, The Florida
Bar and its Department of Lawyer Regulation are charged with the
administration of a statewide disciplinary system to enforce Supreme Court
rules of professional conduct for all lawyers.

                                #   #   #

=============

In article <2qorl8$...@panix.com>, e...@panix.com (Mark Eckenwiler) writes:

Most of you have probably seen the 1988 report documenting Canter's
(and Siegel's) resignation from the Florida Bar.  However, that report
mentions their prior suspension "as a result of a previous discipline,"
which has not (to my knowledge) been publicized.

Below is the text of the 1987 Florida Supreme Court decision suspending
our two friends for 90 days.  Best line: "The respondents are guilty of
a deliberate scheme to misrepresent facts in order to secure full
financing of their purchase [of the real estate in question]."

(Although I've crossposted this article to all the groups where C&S
discussion seems to be happening, I've also limited followups in the
spirit of good net.citizenship.





                          THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
                                        v
                           Martha SIEGEL, Respondent.
                          THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
                                        v
                           LAURENCE CANTER, Respondent
                               Nos. 68956, 68957.
                            Supreme Court of Florida.
                                 Sept. 10, 1987.
                                  511 So.2d 995

  In an attorney disciplinary proceeding, the Supreme Court held that engaging
 in deliberate scheme to misrepresent facts to senior mortgagee in order to
 secure full financing of purchase for law office warrants 90-day suspension
 from practice of law.
  Suspension ordered.

   John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff
 Counsel, Tallahassee, and Thomas E. DeBerg, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tampa, for
 complainant.
  John E. Lund, Tampa, for respondents.

  PER CURIAM.


 These disciplinary proceedings are before us on complaint of the Florida Bar
and the reports of the referee, which are contested by the Bar and by both
respondents.  We have jurisdiction, article V, section 15, Florida
Constitution.
 These complaints involve alleged misrepresentations made by the respondents,
as law partners, in connection with the purchase of the building used primarily
as their law offices.  While the facts are not in dispute, the interpretation
of those facts is heavily disputed:  Because the referee's findings of fact are
supported by competent and substantial evidence, we accept them as stated in
the reports.  Those reports are set out as follows (because they are identical,
they have been consolidated into one document):

  I. Findings of Fact as to Each Item of Misconduct With Which the Respondents
 are Charged:  After a hearing on the matter before me I find the following:
  On October 7, 1983, respondents executed a mortgage and security agreement on
 property they were purchasing for use as their law office.  The agreement
 required that no secondary financing on that real estate would be obtained
 without the express consent of the lender, Southeast Bank, N.A., and F.D.I.C.
 bank.
   On or before October 7, 1983, respondents had agreed with Robert F. Bluck,
 the seller, to secondary financing in lieu of a cash downpayment.  On October
 7, they signed a mortgage agreement with Mr. Bluck for $50,000.00 on the
 subject real estate, and as consideration for the mortgage, executed a
 promissory note for $50,000.00.  Southeast Bank, N.A., was not informed of the
 mortgage agreement between the respondents and Bluck, nor was the
 mortgage ever recorded.
   The contract to purchase from Robert F. Bluck specified a deposit of
 $20,000.00, new mortgage of $150,000.00, and a balance of $30,000.00 to close.
 On a personal financial statement, dated August 4, 1983 and submitted in
 support of the application for The $150,000.00 loan, respondents
 misrepresented that they had made a $20,000.00 downpayment on the
 subject property.  Based on representations made by respondents to
 Southeast Bank, N.A., the bank's mortgage loan report listed the
 equity of Siegel and Canter in the real estate as $50,000.00 and the
 source of equity as cash.
   On June 30, 1984, respondents submitted additional documents to Southeast
 Bank in support of an application for a $45,000.00 loan to be secured by a
 second mortgage on the subject real estate.  On a balance sheet dated June 30,
 1984, respondents listed the mortgage to Southeast Bank, N.A. as a liability,
 but did not disclose the mortgage to Bluck.
   On a personal financial statement dated July 1, 1984, respondents listed the
 mortgage balance on the first mortgage with the bank, but did not disclose the
 unrecorded mortgage with Bluck.  Loan officers at the bank again believed
 respondents to have $50,000.00 cash equity in the property, and were
 unaware of the debt to Robert F. Bluck.
   On August 10, 1984, respondents submitted to the bank a sworn affidavit
 representing that they were aware of no facts by reason of which the title to,
 or possession of, the subject property or any part of it or any personal
 property on it might be disputed or questioned.
   At the time of both loans in question, Southeast Bank, N.A. was
 insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

   II. Recommendation as to Whether or Not the Respondent Should Be Found
 Guilty:  I recommend that the respondents be found guilty of violating the
 following sections of the Code of Professional Responsibility:  Florida Bar
 Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11-02(3)(a) (Conduct contrary to honesty);
 DR 1-102(A)(4) (Conduct involving dishonesty or misrepresentation);  DR 1-
 102(A)(3) (Illegal conduct).

   III. Recommendation as to Disciplinary Measures to be Applied:  I
 recommend that the respondents receive a public reprimand, and be
 suspended from the practice of law for two weeks.  The suspensions of
 respondents, based on the same conduct, need not run concurrently.  I further
 order that respondents be assessed their share of the costs of these
 proceedings.


 We accept in their entirety the referee's findings of fact and recommendations
as to guilt.  However, we must reject the referee's recommendations as to
discipline.  The respondents are guilty of a deliberate scheme to misrepresent
facts in order to secure full financing of their purchase.  We believe that
this sort of fraudulent activity cannot be sufficiently disciplined by a two
week suspension and public reprimand.  We do believe, however, that the Bar's
request for a ninety-one day suspension, thus requiring proof of
rehabilitation, is not warranted.
 Accordingly, we accept the referees findings of fact and recommendations of
guilt.  It is the judgment of this Court that the respondents, Martha Siegel
and Laurence Canter, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of
ninety days, commencing 30 days after the date of this opinion so that the
respondents may close out their business, protect the interests of their
clients, but accept no new business.  These suspensions are to be served
concurrently.  Judgment for costs in the amount of $1,630.01 is hereby entered
against respondent Seigel, and judgment for costs in the amount of $1,679.51 is
hereby entered against respondent Canter, for which sums let execution issue.
 It is so ordered.

  McDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ.,
 concur.

==========================


From a leading database of corporation info:

 PROFIT
  Name:               RICCI ENTERPRISES, INC.
  Number:             07015550
  Incorporation Date: 09/03/1993
  Originated:         ARIZONA
  Duration:           PERPETUAL
  Status:             ACTIVE

 CORPORATE ADDRESS
  In Care of:          LAURENCE A CANTER
  Address:            7150 E CAMELBACK RD
  City/State:         SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251

 REGISTERED AGENT INFORMATION
  Name:               LAURENCE A CANTER
  Address:            7150 E CAMELBACK RD   SCOTTSDALE AZ 85251
  Effective Date:     09/03/1993

 CORPORATE TAX INFORMATION
  Close Month:                  DECEMBER

 OTHER INFORMATION
  Articles Approved:          10/23/1993

 HISTORY INFORMATION
  Date:               09/03/1993
    Number:             17970110005
    Description:        ARTICLES
  Date:               01/07/1994
    Number:             21520820028
    Description:        93 ANNUAL REPORT/MAIL RETURNED

--
 -- Often in error; Never in Doubt!     el...@media.mit.edu     617-253-0381
                                        Lee Campbell            MIT Media Lab



                                    For Immediate Release
                                    October 13,1988
                                    Contact:        Bonnie L Mahon
                                                    The Florida Bar
                                                    Tampa Office
                                    Telephone:      813/875-9821

SUPREME COURT GRANTS ATTORNEY'S PETITION TO RESIGN PERMANENTLY

       TALLAHASSEE, Oct.13-- The Florida Supreme Court has granted
attorney Laurence A. Canter's petition to resign permanently,
effective November 7, 1988.

       Canter, of 240 North Washington Boulevard, Sarasota, was
charged with numerous violations of the attorney disciplinary rules
including neglect, misrepresentation, misappropriation of client funds
and perjury.

       Several of the complaints against Canter involved his failure
to file the necessary or appropriate documents with the United Stated
Immigration and Naturalization Services in matters of permanent
residency and work visas. In addition, Canter refused to refund
clients' funds and neglected to notify his clients that he has been
suspended from the practice of law as a result of a previous
discipline.

       The Florida Bar further alleges that Canter committed perjury
by filing a false affidavit with the Bar and while testifying under
oath in a deposition. These charges resulted after an audit of Canter's
trust account by the Bar showed that trust funds were held in Canter's
account during the time period when he denied any funds were present.

       Canter was born in 1953 and admitted to The Florida Bar in 1980.

       The resignation without leave to apply is not final until time
expires to file motion for rehearing and if filed, determined. The
filling of a motion for rehearing shall not alter the effective date
of this resignation.

       As an official agency of the Supreme Court of Florida, The
Florida Bar and its Department of Lawyer Regulation are charged with
the administration of a statewide disciplinary system to enforce
Supreme Court rules of professional conduct for all lawyers.